In Grand Rapids, Michigan, a passionate restaurant owner named Johnny Brann finds himself in a clash with zoning ordinances over a memorial he created to honor fallen police officers and military personnel. While Brann’s intentions are noble, city leaders argue that the display exceeds signage limits set by regulations. This situation has sparked a contentious debate about how to honor heroes while adhering to zoning laws.

Brann, however, remains steadfast in his commitment to the memorial. He firmly believes that it is a crucial tribute to the sacrifices of law enforcement and military members. Despite facing pressure to dismantle the display, he refuses to do so. Instead, he plans to apply for a variance, determined to preserve the integrity of the memorial.

Amidst the controversy, Brann has made the decision to remove banners that were deemed political and offensive. This move emphasizes the complexity of expressing views in public spaces and highlights the balancing act between personal expression and community harmony.

Navigating the waters of zoning procedures is no easy task. Obtaining a sign variance involves a complex process with fees, public hearings, and decisions made by multiple city authorities. Yet, despite the obstacles, Brann remains hopeful. He firmly believes in the support of the community and their desire to preserve the memorial.

As the city and Brann work through the process, their shared goal is to find a resolution that respects both the aesthetics of the urban landscape and the sentiments of the community who want to pay tribute to the sacrifices made by these heroes.